19715 2012-10-26 10:04:11 +0000 incorrect ARIA errors reported 2013-04-20 07:10:48 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML Checker General unspecified PC Windows NT RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 faulkner.steve mike+validator mike www-validator-cvs oldest_to_newest 77134 0 faulkner.steve 2012-10-26 10:04:11 +0000 when checking this page: http://juicystudio.com/tpg/rbc/combo.html none of the ARIA errors appear to be correct. <li> allows role="option" and any of the aria-* attributes used. aria-activedescendent does not have have to be a desccednent element as reported; "Error: The aria-activedescendant attribute must refer to a descendant element." if the aria-owns property is used to point to a non DOM descendent (which it is) Also on the qa-dev the follwoing error (incorrectly)on the input type=text element: "Error: Attribute readonly not allowed on element input at this point." 86410 1 mike 2013-04-20 07:09:00 +0000 (In reply to comment #0) > when checking this page: http://juicystudio.com/tpg/rbc/combo.html > > none of the ARIA errors appear to be correct. > <li> allows role="option" and any of the aria-* attributes used. Fixed now, I think. You can test at http://validator.w3.org/nu/ > aria-activedescendent does not have have to be a desccednent element as > reported; > "Error: The aria-activedescendant attribute must refer to a descendant > element." > if the aria-owns property is used to point to a non DOM descendent (which it > is) Fixed now, I think. See http://validator.w3.org/nu/ > Also on the qa-dev the follwoing error (incorrectly)on the input type=text > element: > "Error: Attribute readonly not allowed on element input at this point." Fixed now. But not yet pushed to qa-dev. Please test at http://validator.w3.org/nu/ instead.