1969 2005-09-03 16:56:49 +0000 Should Part 2 make the component tableaux normative? 2006-09-21 00:00:28 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.0/1.1 both PC Windows XP RESOLVED WONTFIX important, work needsDrafting P2 normal --- 1 ht w3c-xml-schema-wg www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 5695 0 ht 2005-09-03 16:56:49 +0000 Part 1 has a Schema Component Constraint for every component, the first clause of all of which effectively says "The value constraints in the component tableau above are normative". We don't have anything like that for the Facet components of Part 2. Should we add a single SCC somewhere which enforces this for all Facet component tableaux? I've labelled this "1.0", since strictly speaking this is a bug/weakness in 1.0 and could be handled as a Clarification with Erratum 6698 1 sandygao 2005-10-14 17:28:10 +0000 Discussed at 2005-09-09 telecon. Resolution: to classify as clarification with corrigendum. 7108 2 cmsmcq 2005-11-09 02:23:12 +0000 Version field changed to "1.0/1.1 both" since it applies to both versions of the spec. 7221 3 sandygao 2005-11-18 17:45:38 +0000 Discussed at 2005-11-18 telecon. RESOLUTION: Phase 1 agreement that wrt bug 1969, editors should draft something in 4.1.5 which says properties must be as described in 4.1.1 and either there or at beginning of 4.3, ditto for all facet components 11910 4 cmsmcq 2006-09-21 00:00:28 +0000 At the face to face meeting of January 2006 in St. Petersburg, the Working Group decided not to take further action on this issue in XML Schema 1.1. (This issue was not discussed separately; it was one of those which were dispatched by a blanket decision that all other open issues would be closed without action, unless raised again in last-call comments.) Some members of the Working Group expressed regret over not being able to resolve all the issues dealt with in this way, but on the whole the Working Group felt it better not to delay Datatypes 1.1 in order to resolve all of them. This issue should have been marked as RESOLVED /WONTFIX at that time, but apparently was not. I am marking it that way now, to reduce confusion.