19687 2012-10-24 12:24:29 +0000 It's not entirely clear to me how this algorithm can be correct as Gecko/Opera appear to decode %-sequences when parsing the URL so you cannot have fragid and decoded fragid. 2012-10-29 22:00:51 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED INVALID http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-indicated-part-of-the-document P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian annevk ian mike contributor oldest_to_newest 77041 0 contributor 2012-10-24 12:24:29 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/ Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#the-indicated-part-of-the-document Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#the-indicated-part-of-the-document Comment: It's not entirely clear to me how this algorithm can be correct as Gecko/Opera appear to decode %-sequences when parsing the URL so you cannot have fragid and decoded fragid. Posted from: 212.238.236.229 by annevk@annevk.nl User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/537.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/24.0.1297.0 Safari/537.16 77043 1 annevk 2012-10-24 12:39:12 +0000 Actually, it seems only Gecko does this. Opera only does it in the address bar. Lets not do this then. 77332 2 ian 2012-10-29 22:00:51 +0000 Yeah, this was an area with dubious interop, but I went with what seemed to match the most browsers. Let me know if the URL spec ends up making it not work after all, but I think, as you say, that it is still ok.