1929 2005-09-01 00:21:32 +0000 RQ-141e: Make pattern value be a set of regexes, not one regex 2008-03-05 16:09:47 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.1 only PC Linux CLOSED FIXED resolved P2 normal --- 2247 2401 1 cmsmcq w3c-xml-schema-wg www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 5632 0 cmsmcq 2005-09-01 00:21:32 +0000 This item is a spinoff from the editors' work on RQ-141b. In the course of fixing an alignment problem between Structures and Datatypes as regards the enumeration facet, the editors saw an opportunity for an analogous change to the pattern facet: make its {value} be a set instead of a single regular expression, and change the facet merger rules in Structures to perform the correct set union operation on the facet created in the restriction step and the pattern facet of the base type. Since this change is not essential to reconciling Structures and Datatypes, and since it involves a design choice which ought to be made by the WG, it has been factored out from the larger proposal for RQ-141b to make separate consideration easier. 5699 1 ht 2005-09-04 14:29:54 +0000 Checked in revised version which I (HST) am happy with, think this is ready to go to the WG, all changes tagged with dg="pattern-1929" 5882 2 cmsmcq 2005-09-08 03:47:56 +0000 A proposal for this issue is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.b1929.20050907.html and is ready for WG consideration. 6817 3 ht 2005-10-20 14:41:35 +0000 Revised proposal available at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema- 2/datatypes.b1929.20051020.html, per f2f decisions 6925 4 sandygao 2005-10-27 16:11:20 +0000 Discussed at 2005-10-21 telecon [1]. An amendment was proposed and accepted by the WG. Resolution: Proposal accepted unanimously as amended. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2005Oct/0019.html 7501 5 cmsmcq 2005-12-17 00:34:48 +0000 A proposal to provide for a single set-valued pattern facet was approved in September 2005 in Edinburgh. For reasons not clear from the minutes, it was considered again and approved again on 21 October. As of 15 December, the change has been integrated into the status-quo version of the document. 19305 6 davep 2008-03-05 16:09:47 +0000 Although no formal request for closure was made, since the reporter also noted the resolution of this bug over two years ago, I'm marking it closed.