19128 2012-09-29 05:58:46 +0000 MathML 3.0 current TR somewhat mixed up 2012-10-15 18:51:08 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG HTML5 spec unspecified PC Windows XP RESOLVED INVALID P2 normal --- 1 jmichae3 erika.doyle davidc mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 74857 0 jmichae3 2012-09-29 05:58:46 +0000 http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML3/chapter4.html#contm.qualifiers MathML 3.0 contains *parts* of Content Markup in the TR. if this is a living standard type of document, then OK. I can accept that it is still "in process". It is Content Markup is kind of partially in and partially out. the tags are there in the pages, but not in the navigation. maybe the editor is trying to remove Content Markup from the document altogether? I am trying to figure out what he is doing. browser developers are confused too. usually in the TRs all the tags are listed in the navigation. there is no section for MathML that I can tell in the bug tracking service, and I don't know what heading to put it under. sorry folks. just a user/dev hoping to help. mglyph and semantics is one of those (actually, semantics doesn't look right, doesn't have angle brackets). 74887 1 davidc 2012-09-29 16:19:52 +0000 Errors in the MathML specification should be reported to the www-math@w3.org mailing list rather than this HTML WG bugzilla. If you post there we'll try to clarify any issues that you raise. Currently your query isn't at all clear. Chapter 3 of the MathML REC does contain a full description of Content MathML, the schema for MathML isalmost entirely mechanically extracted from the syntax tables in the REC. It is true that the section title Attribution via semantics could perhaps have been called Attribution via <semantics> is that your issue? 76327 2 erika.doyle 2012-10-15 18:51:08 +0000 Hi Jim, This Bugzilla component is scoped to the HTML5 specification. Please direct any feedback you have for the MathML spec to the www-math@w3.org list, as described by David. Thanks, Erika Navara