<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>19084</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-09-26 22:55:21 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[XSLT 3.0] Accumulators and import precedence</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2014-05-15 14:00:39 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>XSLT 3.0</component>
          <version>Last Call drafts</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Kay">mike</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Michael Kay">mike</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>74600</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2012-09-26 22:55:21 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>We say nothing on the question of whether accumulators can be overridden in an importing stylesheet, or what constraints there are on such overriding; nor do we say anything about accumulators in the context of packages. We give accumulators a &quot;visibility&quot; attribute, but section 3.6.2 defines visibility as a property of a &quot;component&quot;, and accumulators are not currently included in the definition of components.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>82965</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2013-02-12 10:01:18 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Agreed that accumulators should be named components, should be subject to import precedence using the usual rules for named components. We shouldn&apos;t provide any mechanism to override individual accumulator rules selectively. Editor to draft the required text.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>87762</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2013-05-16 11:44:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The principles for the resolution of this were agreed in the Prague F2F and the editor responded by drafting detailed text which is present in the current review draft.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>91460</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2013-07-31 15:44:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The new text has now been approved.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>