19047 2012-09-25 21:59:51 +0000 how about minlength? i'd like to see certain fields to have a minimum amoung of characters for validation 2013-03-11 16:46:27 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG HTML5 spec unspecified Other other RESOLVED LATER http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-maxlength-attribute P3 normal --- 1 contributor dave.null ayg ian mike mounir public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 74501 0 contributor 2012-09-25 21:59:51 +0000 This was was cloned from bug 10053 as part of operation LATER convergence. Originally filed: 2010-06-30 02:41:00 +0000 ================================================================================ #0 contributor@whatwg.org 2010-06-30 02:41:03 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-maxlength-attribute Comment: how about minlength? i'd like to see certain fields to have a minimum amoung of characters for validation Posted from: 209.99.13.239 ================================================================================ #1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2010-08-28 04:48:30 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Maybe one day. Let's let the browsers catch up first. ================================================================================ #2 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2010-09-10 09:39:49 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** Bug 10308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ================================================================================ #3 Mounir Lamouri 2011-01-26 20:56:51 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** Bug 11870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ================================================================================ #4 Aryeh Gregor 2011-01-27 01:02:51 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note that minlength="n" is equivalent to pattern=".{n}". Not clear if it's common enough to really need special handling. ================================================================================ #5 Mounir Lamouri 2011-01-27 15:25:48 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (In reply to comment #4) > Note that minlength="n" is equivalent to pattern=".{n}". Not clear if it's > common enough to really need special handling. No, minlength="n" isn't equivalent too pattern=".{n}". @pattern should only be used for specific cases given that it removes all semantic. In addition of passwords fields that require a minimum length (I guess that would be the primary use case), minlength could be used for field that require a specific length in association with maxlength (with maxlength and minlength having the same value). ================================================================================ 84251 1 robin 2013-03-11 16:46:27 +0000 *** Bug 18140 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***