19000 2012-09-25 00:55:50 +0000 I would like to see localStorage enhanced. localStorage could easily be enhanced to meet the needs for an offline database. A call such as localStorage(key, callback); should be available. This would provide an instantly understandable way for developers 2012-10-10 02:26:15 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED WONTFIX http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian ian mike contributor oldest_to_newest 74381 0 contributor 2012-09-25 00:55:50 +0000 Specification: http://www.w3.org/TR/webstorage/ Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#top Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#top Comment: I would like to see localStorage enhanced. localStorage could easily be enhanced to meet the needs for an offline database. A call such as localStorage(key, callback); should be available. This would provide an instantly understandable way for developers to write powerful offline storage solutions. This could provide an intermediate solution between regular localStorage and indexedDB. Posted from: 71.79.27.22 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/21.0.1180.89 Safari/537.1 75777 1 ian 2012-10-10 02:26:15 +0000 While I agree, the last time I tried adding features to Web Storage the browser vendors pretty uniformly told me that they had no interest in adding new features to it and that IndexDB was the way forward.