<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>1892</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-08-26 13:45:09 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>R-180: Question about the schema error code property in the PSVI</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-03-29 18:48:40 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Structures: XSD Part 1</component>
          <version>1.0 only</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>ASSIGNED</bug_status>
          <resolution></resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>decided</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>5503</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2005-08-26 13:45:09 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The spec says &quot;If the item is not valid, then a list.&quot; So it seems to imply 
that a processor needs to provide such a list if the validity is 
either &quot;invalid&quot; or &quot;unknown&quot;. My question is: what should be provided when it 
is &quot;unknown&quot;? 

See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002OctDec/0014.html

Also see a response here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002OctDec/0044.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>6420</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2005-09-23 02:56:16 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Discussed at 2005-09-02 telecon
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2005Sep/0053
Error with erratum.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>6655</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2005-10-06 17:11:08 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Henry&apos;s response contains the proposed wording. More specifically, to change 
the [schema error code] property in sections 3.2.5 and 3.3.5 in structures from:
  If the item is not ·valid·, then a list.
to
  If the item is ·invalid·, then a list.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>6673</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2005-10-11 01:41:00 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Discussed at 2005-10-07 telecon. The wording proposal included in comment #2 
was approved.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>