18917 2012-09-19 14:48:09 +0000 As only WorkerGlobalScope implements WorkerUtils, merge them. 2013-01-30 23:32:11 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#workerutils P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian annevk ian mike contributor oldest_to_newest 74070 0 contributor 2012-09-19 14:48:09 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/ Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#workerutils Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#workerutils Comment: As only WorkerGlobalScope implements WorkerUtils, merge them. Posted from: 212.238.236.229 by annevk@annevk.nl User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_4) AppleWebKit/537.10 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/23.0.1262.0 Safari/537.10 77367 1 ian 2012-10-30 00:20:41 +0000 I like having WorkerUtils as an editorial aid, means I can keep the list of core mechanics separate from the list of what the interface supports. The idea is that there's no way to tell (though maybe [Supplemental]'s replacement didn't fully give me that?). 77384 2 annevk 2012-10-30 09:22:20 +0000 Please add a note to that effect (I suspect this will keep coming up otherwise) or make it even more clear by using "partial interface WorkerGlobalScope"? 77448 3 ian 2012-10-30 17:51:15 +0000 Well only you have brought it up so far, but ok. :-P Using partial instead seems reasonable. 82374 4 contributor 2013-01-30 23:32:11 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r7675. Check-in comment: Merge WorkerUtils into WorkerGlobalScope http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7674&to=7675