18874 2012-09-14 09:16:30 +0000 Should the cookie property be enumerable and what should the [Has] operator return for cookies in the various situations? 2013-03-28 06:27:20 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED WORKSFORME http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#sandboxCookies P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian ian mike zcorpan contributor oldest_to_newest 73854 0 contributor 2012-09-14 09:16:30 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/dom.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#sandboxCookies Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#sandboxCookies Comment: Should the cookie property be enumerable and what should the [Has] operator return for cookies in the various situations? Posted from: 2001:4c28:a030:30:68c4:cade:3263:5f5 User agent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; U; en) Presto/2.10.289 Version/12.02 78751 1 ian 2012-11-25 02:49:45 +0000 I don't understand the question. Why would it be any different than any other property? It's just a string, no? 80776 2 ian 2012-12-31 05:33:45 +0000 zcorpan, if this was your bug, ping. 85006 3 zcorpan 2013-03-26 10:34:27 +0000 I didn't file the bug, but a colleague did. He said the current spec is OK, so maybe it was fixed since he filed the bug. "If the contents are sandboxed into a unique origin (e.g. in an iframe with the sandbox attribute), a SecurityError exception will be thrown on getting and setting." 85081 4 ian 2013-03-28 06:27:20 +0000 Great, thanks!