18573 2012-08-15 09:59:47 +0000 Mention crosslapping for QoI 2012-08-27 08:51:59 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG Media Source Extensions unspecified PC Linux VERIFIED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 philipj acolwell acolwell mike public-html-media public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 72195 0 philipj 2012-08-15 09:59:47 +0000 http://xiph.org/vorbis/doc/vorbisfile/crosslap.html This is a quality of implementation issue, but crosslapping (not crossfading) can be used both when switching between streams that align perfectly and ones that have come overlap. A non-normative link to the vorbisfile documentation could be useful to implementors. 72209 1 acolwell 2012-08-15 16:45:17 +0000 (In reply to comment #0) > http://xiph.org/vorbis/doc/vorbisfile/crosslap.html > > This is a quality of implementation issue, but crosslapping (not crossfading) > can be used both when switching between streams that align perfectly and ones > that have come overlap. A non-normative link to the vorbisfile documentation > could be useful to implementors. Mind if I change the text to "crossfade or crosslap" since crosslapping might not be an option for non-Vorbis codecs like AAC, HE-AAC, or MP3? 72271 2 philipj 2012-08-16 08:17:53 +0000 Crosslapping is actually performed on raw PCM buffers, it isn't a codec-specific technique. But yes, mentioning both is fine. Note that "crosslapping" has slightly better searchability than "crosslap", so if it can be phrased as such it'd be great. 72744 3 acolwell 2012-08-24 22:47:24 +0000 Changes committed. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/rev/ca093bbbbefb