<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>1852</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-08-17 15:37:49 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>RQ-141b -- Changes to Part 2 to align with Part 1 (Requirement)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-03-05 14:36:40 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Datatypes: XSD Part 2</component>
          <version>1.1 only</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2005Aug/0015.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>status?</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>needsReview</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>critical</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>1843</dependson>
    
    <dependson>1853</dependson>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Henry S. Thompson">ht</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>5420</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Henry S. Thompson">ht</who>
    <bug_when>2005-08-17 15:37:49 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Umbrella issue for all the sub-parts remaining to be done, as discussed
at the August 2005 f2f</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>5423</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Henry S. Thompson">ht</who>
    <bug_when>2005-08-17 15:42:27 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Get dependency in right direction</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>8029</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2006-01-28 18:07:57 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>A wording proposal to take care of most of the necessary changes
was sent to the WG on 27 January 2006.  The alignment in the
proposal may be incomplete, but it takes care at least of the most
egregious conflicts.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>11908</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2006-09-21 00:00:28 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>At the face to face meeting of January 2006 in St. Petersburg,
the Working Group decided not to take further action on this
issue in XML Schema 1.1.  (This issue was not discussed
separately; it was one of those which were dispatched by a
blanket decision that all other open issues would be closed
without action, unless raised again in last-call comments.)  Some
members of the Working Group expressed regret over not being able
to resolve all the issues dealt with in this way, but on the
whole the Working Group felt it better not to delay Datatypes 1.1
in order to resolve all of them.

This issue should have been marked as RESOLVED /WONTFIX at that
time, but apparently was not.  I am marking it that way now, to
reduce confusion.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19300</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Dave Peterson">davep</who>
    <bug_when>2008-03-05 14:36:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #0)
&gt; Umbrella issue for all the sub-parts remaining to be done, as discussed
&gt; at the August 2005 f2f

Even after reviewing the minutes of that meeting, I can&apos;t figure out what the issues of &quot;sub-parts remaining to be done&quot; are.  Since no one has complained about the resolution in over a year, I&apos;m marking this closed.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>