<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>18497</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-08-07 08:11:45 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Should values of &apos;overflow&apos; applying to (inline-)table elements be restricted?</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2012-09-13 10:01:06 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>CSS</product>
          <component>CSS Level 2</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>ASSIGNED</bug_status>
          <resolution></resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Anton P">antonsforums</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Bert Bos">bert</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact>public-css-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>71872</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Anton P">antonsforums</who>
    <bug_when>2012-08-07 08:11:45 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Reported by Morten Stenshorne

When applying the &apos;overflow&apos; property to table elements, major UAs appear to ignore all values except &apos;visible&apos;, &apos;hidden&apos;, &apos;inherit&apos;.

Should this be formalized in the spec?

Conversation begins:
Bug description:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0438.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>71873</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Anton P">antonsforums</who>
    <bug_when>2012-08-07 08:13:11 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This bug has a dependency on Comment No.6 of Bug 17505 which questions whether the &apos;overflow&apos; property should have its effect on the table wrapper box or the table box</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>71874</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
      <attachid>1167</attachid>
    <who name="Anton P">antonsforums</who>
    <bug_when>2012-08-07 08:25:44 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 1167
Test to illustrate whether &apos;overflow:hidden&apos; is applied or ignored on table elements</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>71875</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
      <attachid>1168</attachid>
    <who name="Anton P">antonsforums</who>
    <bug_when>2012-08-07 08:27:17 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 1168
Test to illustrate whether &apos;overflow:scroll&apos; is applied or ignored on table elements</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>71876</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
      <attachid>1169</attachid>
    <who name="Anton P">antonsforums</who>
    <bug_when>2012-08-07 08:28:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 1169
Test to illustrate whether &apos;overflow:auto&apos; is applied or ignored on table elements</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>71957</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Anton P">antonsforums</who>
    <bug_when>2012-08-09 05:50:00 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; This bug has a dependency on Comment No.6 of Bug 17505 which questions whether
&gt; the &apos;overflow&apos; property should have its effect on the table wrapper box or the
&gt; table box

The WG resolved[1] that the &apos;overflow&apos; property has its effect on the table box.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0298.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>71958</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Anton P">antonsforums</who>
    <bug_when>2012-08-09 05:52:11 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The WG resolved[1] that the visual effect of the values &apos;auto&apos; and &apos;scroll&apos; on the table box is exactly the same as that of the value &apos;visible&apos;.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0298.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>73751</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Anton P">antonsforums</who>
    <bug_when>2012-09-13 08:51:10 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The WG resolved[1] to accept the following proposal (presented in [2]).

In 11.1.1, in the description of the values of the &apos;overflow&apos; property, make the following changes:

   : scroll
   :   This value indicates that the content is clipped and that if the
   :   user agent uses a scrolling mechanism that is visible on the
   :   screen (such as a scroll bar or a panner), that mechanism should
   :   be displayed for a box whether or not any of its content is
   :   clipped. This avoids any problem with scrollbars appearing and
   :   disappearing in a dynamic environment. When this value is
   :   specified and the target medium is &apos;print&apos;, overflowing content
   :   may be printed. &lt;ins&gt;When used on table boxes, this value has the
   :   same meaning as &apos;visible&apos;.&lt;/ins&gt;
   : auto
   :   The behavior of the &apos;auto&apos; value is user agent-dependent, but
   :   should cause a scrolling mechanism to be provided for overflowing
   :   boxes. &lt;ins&gt;When used on table boxes, this value has the same
   :   meaning as &apos;visible&apos;.&lt;/ins&gt;



[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0231.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0308.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>73755</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Anton P">antonsforums</who>
    <bug_when>2012-09-13 10:01:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The errata document contains provisional wording added before the resolution described in Comment 7 was reached: http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-20110607-errata.html#s.11.1.1a

The provisional wording should be replaced with the wording from the resolution.  Also, the first clause of the provisional wording (&quot;On a table element (&apos;display: table&apos;), &apos;overflow&apos; applies to the table box (i.e., not the table wrapper box)&quot;) should be removed since it is not directly related to this issue, and in any case is being handled separately in Bug 17122 (see Comment no.6 therein).</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>1167</attachid>
            <date>2012-08-07 08:25:44 +0000</date>
            <delta_ts>2012-08-07 08:25:44 +0000</delta_ts>
            <desc>Test to illustrate whether &apos;overflow:hidden&apos; is applied or ignored on table elements</desc>
            <filename>Overflow-hidden_on_table_with_caption.html</filename>
            <type>text/html</type>
            <size>1475</size>
            <attacher name="Anton P">antonsforums</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCgk8dGl0bGU+b3ZlcmZsb3cgb24gdGFibGUgd2l0aCBj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=
</data>

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>1168</attachid>
            <date>2012-08-07 08:27:17 +0000</date>
            <delta_ts>2012-08-07 08:27:17 +0000</delta_ts>
            <desc>Test to illustrate whether &apos;overflow:scroll&apos; is applied or ignored on table elements</desc>
            <filename>overflow-scroll_on_table_with_caption.html</filename>
            <type>text/html</type>
            <size>1475</size>
            <attacher name="Anton P">antonsforums</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCgk8dGl0bGU+b3ZlcmZsb3cgb24gdGFibGUgd2l0aCBj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=
</data>

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>1169</attachid>
            <date>2012-08-07 08:28:40 +0000</date>
            <delta_ts>2012-08-07 08:28:40 +0000</delta_ts>
            <desc>Test to illustrate whether &apos;overflow:auto&apos; is applied or ignored on table elements</desc>
            <filename>Overflow-auto_on_table_with_caption.html</filename>
            <type>text/html</type>
            <size>1473</size>
            <attacher name="Anton P">antonsforums</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCgk8dGl0bGU+b3ZlcmZsb3cgb24gdGFibGUgd2l0aCBj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</data>

          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>