18357 2012-07-23 12:11:12 +0000 [XSLT 3.0] editorial bugs noted by Abel Braaksma 2014-05-15 14:00:25 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XSLT 3.0 Working drafts PC All CLOSED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 mike mike public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 71305 0 mike 2012-07-23 12:11:12 +0000 From the XSL WG mailing list: Just one typo in a code segment, one editorial issue and one question: 1. Under 4.6, a code segment has a typo: Expressions such as (/) instanceof document-node(element(invoice)) also require look-ahead as far as the start-tag of the first element. this should be [...] (/) instance of document-node(element(invoice)) [...] 2. There are references to XDM's is-idrefs, written as is-IDREF, is-idref, is-idrefs, same for is-id, which is written as is-ID in two occurrences. I'm not 100% sure (my XDM knowledge is not so up-to-date), but I believe these should be is-idrefs and is-id respectively. 3. Under 18.3, the term incrementor function is introduced. I couldn't find a definitive reference on this term in the internet. Is it a "proper" term? Should it be "increment function"? Cheers, Abel 71306 1 mike 2012-07-23 12:12:37 +0000 On point 3, the only reference to the term "incrementor function" is where it is being defined. So we probably don't really need the term. We could call it the "delta function" since we then refer to it using the greek letter delta. In fact, we could call it anything we like. 71654 2 mike 2012-07-30 11:16:34 +0000 Thanks; these editorial comments have now been addressed.