<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>18107</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-07-18 17:18:16 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>pre is stylistic (typografic) rather than semantic. it always has been. The use-cases should be rewritten so it becomes semantic (What is semantically wrong with using code in a p instead of a pre?) In fact, personally I do not think pre has any semantic</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2012-08-23 21:26:27 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML WG</product>
          <component>HTML5 spec</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>other</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-pre-element</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P3</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>contributor</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="This bug has no owner yet - up for the taking">dave.null</assigned_to>
          <cc>eoconnor</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-admin</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-wg-issue-tracking</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="HTML WG Bugzilla archive list">public-html-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>70682</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="">contributor</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-18 17:18:16 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This was was cloned from bug 16600 as part of operation convergence.
Originally filed: 2012-04-02 10:33:00 +0000

================================================================================
 #0   contributor@whatwg.org                          2012-04-02 10:33:34 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/grouping-content.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#the-pre-element
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#the-pre-element

Comment:
pre is stylistic (typografic) rather than semantic. it always has been. The
use-cases should be rewritten so it becomes semantic (What is semantically
wrong with using code in a p instead of a pre?) In fact, personally I do not
think pre has any semantic value, so why keep it other than the fact it is
used so often? Simply deprecate it. Browsers can still render it so it will
remain backwards compatible?

Posted from: 88.244.70.57
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0
================================================================================</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>72652</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Edward O&apos;Connor">eoconnor</who>
    <bug_when>2012-08-23 21:26:27 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>EDITOR&apos;S RESPONSE: This is an Editor&apos;s Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:

   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: No change.
Rationale: The &lt;pre&gt; element has several use cases which are difficult
for Web authors to achieve by using other features. Also, the Web corpus
contains a tremendous amount of &lt;pre&gt; usage, so we can never remove it
from the platform.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>