18083 2012-07-18 17:13:08 +0000 The link goes to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Snapshot 2010 instead of Cascading Style Sheets Level 2 Revision 1 2012-09-14 04:53:07 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG HTML5 spec unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#refsCSS editorial P4 normal --- 1 contributor silviapfeiffer1 eoconnor erika.doyle kennyluck mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 70634 0 contributor 2012-07-18 17:13:08 +0000 This was was cloned from bug 16073 as part of operation convergence. Originally filed: 2012-02-22 09:32:00 +0000 ================================================================================ #0 contributor@whatwg.org 2012-02-22 09:32:38 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/references.html#references Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#refsCSS Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#refsCSS Comment: The link goes to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Snapshot 2010 instead of Cascading Style Sheets Level 2 Revision 1 Posted from: 114.43.115.130 by kennyluck@csail.mit.edu User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_2) AppleWebKit/534.51.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.1 Safari/534.51.22 ================================================================================ #1 Ms2ger 2012-03-03 20:33:02 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- That seems correct. ================================================================================ #2 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu 2012-03-03 23:07:33 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (In reply to comment #1) > That seems correct. I am not sure how spec linking works but that document (CSS 2010) is highly unhelpful and potentially confusing in various places where [CSS] is used (e.g. when the spec refers to 'unicode-bidi', 'whitespace', 'width', 'height', etc.). The preferred fallback when the corresponding CSS modules are so outdated should be CSS2.1, not this mysterious 2010 document, I think. ================================================================================ #3 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu 2012-03-03 23:10:31 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note that the reference title now says "Cascading Style Sheets Level 2 Revision 1" so there's an inconsistency anyway. ================================================================================ 72238 1 Ms2ger 2012-08-15 17:13:37 +0000 Filter on [Idon'tcareaboutHTMLWGbugspam]. 73378 2 eoconnor 2012-09-06 23:30:29 +0000 Fixed in WHATWG r7204. 73827 3 silviapfeiffer1 2012-09-14 04:53:07 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/3f17eec666eafdd928e41e1255ebd0364c6e2f18 Rationale: accepted WHATWG fix