17898 2012-07-18 07:14:30 +0000 Index of methods and IDL attributes 2015-08-30 11:57:14 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED MOVED https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/55 http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#index tools P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian ian mike robin zcorpan contributor oldest_to_newest 70265 0 contributor 2012-07-18 07:14:30 +0000 This was was cloned from bug 13883 as part of operation convergence. Originally filed: 2011-08-24 09:09:00 +0000 ================================================================================ #0 contributor@whatwg.org 2011-08-24 09:09:47 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/timers.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#custom-handlers Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#custom-handlers Comment: Make "registerProtocolHandler" and "registerContentHandler" appear in the TOC Posted from: 88.131.66.80 by simonp@opera.com User agent: Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5.8; U; en) Presto/2.9.168 Version/11.50 ================================================================================ #1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2011-10-12 19:04:44 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Why? Or even, how? The section title would be really long if it included both those method names, not to mention the other method names defined in that section... ================================================================================ #2 Simon Pieters 2011-10-13 05:02:04 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Why? To make it easier to find (some sections have the relevant API in the ToC, e.g. designMode). But I guess that applies to any method. Maybe we should have an index of APIs as an appendix or something. ================================================================================ #3 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2011-10-24 18:20:13 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- An index would make a lot of sense. An IDL index would be something we can completely automate. The IDL blocks are computer-readable, and for each IDL field there's a corresponding <dfn>. If someone can hack together a quick script that just scans all the IDL blocks and extracts out all the methods and fields and forms an alphabetical index of them, I'd be happy to add that script to my publishing pipeline. ================================================================================ #4 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2011-10-25 05:13:43 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Please reassign to me if you have such a script.) ================================================================================ 122904 1 mike 2015-08-30 11:57:14 +0000 Moved to https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/55