17774 2012-07-13 18:41:40 +0000 "For the purposes of document summaries, outlines, and the like," should be treated as a UI issue, and should not be restricted in what text to use. It is e.g. resonable to join the headings with ": " if the hgroup is used for heading+subheading. 2012-09-14 05:08:40 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG HTML5 spec unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-hgroup-element P3 normal --- 1 contributor dave.null ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking silviapfeiffer1 zcorpan public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 69951 0 contributor 2012-07-13 18:41:40 +0000 This was was cloned from bug 14707 as part of operation convergence. Originally filed: 2011-11-06 09:26:00 +0000 ================================================================================ #0 contributor@whatwg.org 2011-11-06 09:26:17 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/sections.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#the-hgroup-element Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#the-hgroup-element Comment: "For the purposes of document summaries, outlines, and the like," should be treated as a UI issue, and should not be restricted in what text to use. It is e.g. resonable to join the headings with ": " if the hgroup is used for heading+subheading. Posted from: 85.227.157.105 by simonp@opera.com User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/16.0.912.21 Safari/535.7 ================================================================================ #1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2011-11-11 00:20:51 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- That seems reasonable. Do you think we should remove the paragraph entirely, or do you think there is value in some weaker wording as implementation advice? If the latter, what do you think it should say? ================================================================================ #2 Simon Pieters 2011-11-11 07:18:30 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Either is fine with me. ================================================================================ #3 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2011-12-07 23:19:42 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'll nuke the paragraph and make sure there's an example somewhere that gives sample behaviour. ================================================================================ 73839 1 silviapfeiffer1 2012-09-14 05:08:40 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/45eaa5dd791e40812c51d1e809e92e5af5d24f5b Rationale: accepted WHATWG fix