17642 2012-06-28 19:22:30 +0000 This should be explicit that this means the ISO 8601 week number. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601#Week_dates 2012-09-12 00:18:54 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#weeks P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian edwin_hoogerbeets ian mike contributor oldest_to_newest 69514 0 contributor 2012-06-28 19:22:30 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-microsyntaxes.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#weeks Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#weeks Comment: This should be explicit that this means the ISO 8601 week number. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601#Week_dates Posted from: 67.180.233.222 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/536.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/19.0.1084.52 Safari/536.5 71005 1 contributor 2012-07-18 17:54:19 +0000 This bug was cloned to create bug 18269 as part of operation convergence. 73655 2 contributor 2012-09-12 00:17:49 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r7334. Check-in comment: Mention ISO 8601 in the 'week' section. This is a note, since it's non-normative but the statement could be confused as normative if it wasn't made a note. Also, it's qualified, because I'm not sure it's 100% true for dates before the introduction of the Gregorian calendar (it's proleptic, but I can't find any evidence that ISO8601's weeks are too, and wikipedia says ISO8601 isn't proleptic in general unless you have prior agreement as we do here). Also, it's different from the recent edit to the W3C spec for the same issue because the W3C one breaks the editorial convention used in this spec that avoids having references in sentences. Wow that's a long checkin comment for such a minor issue. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7333&to=7334