17637 2012-06-28 18:52:27 +0000 If this input type is meant to represent the ISO week number of the Gregorian calendar, then this description should say so in order to be explicit and unambiguous about it. If not, then some of the description should change. For example, "... on the morn 2012-08-26 03:06:15 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED WORKSFORME http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#week-state-(type=week) P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian edwin_hoogerbeets ian mike contributor oldest_to_newest 69509 0 contributor 2012-06-28 18:52:27 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#week-state-(type=week) Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#week-state-(type=week) Comment: If this input type is meant to represent the ISO week number of the Gregorian calendar, then this description should say so in order to be explicit and unambiguous about it. If not, then some of the description should change. For example, "... on the morning of the Monday of the parsed week.." should be "... on the morning of the Monday contained within the parsed week ..." as weeks start on different days in different locales. Posted from: 67.180.233.222 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/536.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/19.0.1084.52 Safari/536.5 70995 1 contributor 2012-07-18 17:53:15 +0000 This bug was cloned to create bug 18264 as part of operation convergence. 72779 2 ian 2012-08-26 03:06:15 +0000 The section says "The input element represents a control for setting the element's value to a string representing a specific week", where "week" links to a precise definition of what it means. So I think this should be completely unambiguous already.