17633 2012-06-28 17:54:48 +0000 Should ordered list numbering consider list items in child blocks? 2013-10-22 22:13:51 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED DUPLICATE 17632 http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-ol-element P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian bzbarsky ian mike Ms2ger contributor oldest_to_newest 69502 0 contributor 2012-06-28 17:54:48 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/grouping-content.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#the-ol-element Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#the-ol-element Comment: Should ordered list numbering consider list items in child blocks? Posted from: 98.110.194.72 by bzbarsky@mit.edu User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:16.0) Gecko/16.0 Firefox/16.0 69503 1 bzbarsky 2012-06-28 17:56:43 +0000 Consider this testcase: <ol> <div><li>One</li></div> <li>Two</li> <li>Three</li> </ol> This is numbered "1, 2, 3" by Gecko, WebKit, IE7 and before, and IE quirks mode. It's numbered "1, 1, 2" by IE8 and IE9 standards modes and Presto. I'm pretty sure that at least for quirks mode pages depend on this behavior. I would also somewhat prefer that the behavior here not depend on mode... Note that for <ol reversed> this also raises the question of how the start value is computed. 69508 2 Ms2ger 2012-06-28 18:38:13 +0000 http://w3c-test.org/html/tests/submission/Ms2ger/rendering/TODO-lists.html 70993 3 contributor 2012-07-18 17:53:02 +0000 This bug was cloned to create bug 18263 as part of operation convergence. 72648 4 ian 2012-08-23 21:12:15 +0000 There's two questions here really. What the semantic number of the list items is, and what the rendered number is. For conforming documents in the absence of CSS, they should match. For the non-conforming cases, I don't really care if they match. Ideally I'd like to define the rendering purely in terms of CSS, but CSS doesn't yet support the logic for "reverse". Semantically, I'm fine with the <div> subtree being ignored and the nodes being "1" and "2". I'm not sure what to do in the meantime. 77464 5 ian 2012-10-30 22:25:22 +0000 I'm going to mark this as a dupe of bug 17632, "Define rendering of <li> elements in terms of CSS". *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 17632 ***