17462 2012-06-11 15:33:39 +0000 [QT3TS] K-SeqExprCast-3, 4, 7, 9-13, K-SeqExprCastable-4 to -6, 12, 13 2012-10-10 13:38:37 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XQuery 3 & XPath 3 Test Suite Working drafts PC Windows NT RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 tim oneil public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 68920 0 tim 2012-06-11 15:33:39 +0000 Tests such as 'string' cast as xs:anySimpleType 'string' cast as xs:untyped 'string' cast as xs:anyType 3 cast as xs:doesNotExist 'string' castable as xs:anySimpleType 'string' castable as xs:untyped which expect XPST0051 in XQ10 should expect in XQST0052 XQ30. This is because of the change of SingleType (as used in cast and castable expressions) from AtomicType? to SimpleTypeName?. err:XPST0051 It is a static error if a QName that is used as an AtomicType in a SequenceType is not defined in the in-scope schema types as an atomic type. err:XQST0052 The type must be the name of a type defined in the in-scope schema types, and the {variety} of the type must be simple. 68967 1 tim 2012-06-12 11:07:10 +0000 K2-DefaultNamespaceProlog-12 has a similar problem. 74417 2 oneil 2012-09-25 11:20:39 +0000 I suggest for these tests cases that we include in the result the following opions: <any-of> ... <error code="XQST0052"/> <error code="XPST0051"/> </any-of> Do you agree? 74418 3 tim 2012-09-25 11:25:55 +0000 As this shows a difference between XQ10 and XQ30 behaviour, I think the tests will have to be duplicated with appropriate dependencies on XQ10 or XQ30. 74419 4 oneil 2012-09-25 11:32:58 +0000 (In reply to comment #3) > As this shows a difference between XQ10 and XQ30 behaviour, I think the tests > will have to be duplicated with appropriate dependencies on XQ10 or XQ30. Yes it makes sense. I will add the new tests for XQ30 74424 5 oneil 2012-09-25 13:57:33 +0000 Test cases added and committed to cvs 74430 6 tim 2012-09-25 15:05:05 +0000 The 'old' tests need to be marked <dependency type="spec" value="XQ10"/> 74436 7 oneil 2012-09-25 15:24:38 +0000 Ok. Made the change as suggested. Committed to cvs. 74635 8 tim 2012-09-27 09:57:34 +0000 Sorry, I missed one out. K-SeqExprCast-5 has a similar problem. Also, the annotations should also include XP20 (for those marked with XQ10) and XP30 (for those marked with XQ30). Furthermore, I suspect that K-SeqExprCast-4a and K-SeqExprCastable-5a should expect XPST0080, but the definition of XPST0080 will have to extend to cover this. I have raised this as a bug against the spec (Bug 19090). 74637 9 tim 2012-09-27 10:02:21 +0000 Test K2-DefaultNamespaceProlog-12 also needs to be duplicated and fixed for XQ30+/XP30+ to expect XQST0052. 74925 10 oneil 2012-10-01 14:24:25 +0000 Test cases mentioned in comment #8 and comment #9 now fixed 75809 11 tim 2012-10-10 10:09:45 +0000 Tests K-SeqExprCast-4a and K-SeqExprCastable-5a need to be updated to expect XPST0080 after the decision in yesterday's teleconference regarding Bug 19090. 75811 12 oneil 2012-10-10 10:23:34 +0000 (In reply to comment #11) > Tests K-SeqExprCast-4a and K-SeqExprCastable-5a need to be updated to expect > XPST0080 after the decision in yesterday's teleconference regarding Bug > 19090. Ok. Error code changed accordingly. 75826 13 tim 2012-10-10 13:20:34 +0000 K-SeqExprCastable-5a still appears to be unchanged. 75827 14 oneil 2012-10-10 13:38:37 +0000 (In reply to comment #13) > K-SeqExprCastable-5a still appears to be unchanged. Oh, I made the mistake in changing K-SeqExprCast-5a instead. I have now fixed this and confirm the test case K-SeqExprCastable-5a has been updated accordingly