<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>17429</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-06-06 15:33:13 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>is the &quot;name&quot; attribute valid on &lt;meta&gt; element in &lt;body&gt; context? Validator says no at the moment, but this document doesn&apos;t preclude the possibility.</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2012-07-18 18:39:53 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WHATWG</product>
          <component>HTML</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>other</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WORKSFORME</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-meta-element</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P3</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>Unsorted</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>contributor</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</assigned_to>
          <cc>mike</cc>
          
          <qa_contact>contributor</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>68765</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="">contributor</who>
    <bug_when>2012-06-06 15:33:13 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#the-meta-element
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#the-meta-element

Comment:
is the &quot;name&quot; attribute valid on &lt;meta&gt; element in &lt;body&gt; context? Validator
says no at the moment, but this document doesn&apos;t preclude the possibility. 

Posted from: 89.255.128.66
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_4) AppleWebKit/536.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/19.0.1084.53 Safari/536.5</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>68778</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael[tm] Smith">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2012-06-07 08:00:34 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>If you&apos;re looking just at the W3C HTML spec itself only, that does actually preclude the possibility of the meta element being using in the body atl, because it classifies meta strictly as metadata content, which is only allowed within the head element.

But the Microdata spec says that if a meta element has an itemprop attribute, that makes it flow content and phrasing content, which allows it to be used in the body. But it also adds the restriction that If a meta element has an itemprop attribute, the name, http-equiv, and charset attributes must be omitted.

http://dev.w3.org/html5/md/#other-changes-to-html5

So that means meta@name is never allowed in the body.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>