17331 2012-06-05 11:22:48 +0000 (AudioParamUnits): AudioParam.units undefined 2012-07-09 09:16:36 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified AudioWG Web Audio API unspecified PC All CLOSED FIXED P2 normal TBD 1 philipj dave.null crogers mage olivier.thereaux philipj public-audio dave.null oldest_to_newest 68641 0 philipj 2012-06-05 11:22:48 +0000 Audio-ISSUE-35 (AudioParamUnits): AudioParam.units undefined [Web Audio API] http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/track/issues/35 Raised by: Philip Jägenstedt On product: Web Audio API It looks like this was intended to be an enumeration, but it has not been defined. What value should be returned and what is the use case? 69034 1 crogers 2012-06-14 00:52:17 +0000 This has been removed in: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/rev/d1fb69113f02 For now, at least, it seems better to leave this out, since the use case is not clear 69200 2 philipj 2012-06-18 12:37:58 +0000 We obviously agree with the removal, but lots of unrelated changes are included in the diff. Are those in need of review, and in the context of what bug? 69581 3 olivier.thereaux 2012-07-03 07:47:40 +0000 (In reply to comment #2) > We obviously agree with the removal, but lots of unrelated changes are included > in the diff. Are those in need of review, and in the context of what bug? The other changes seem to be mostly examples and clarifications, so probably uncontroversial. Back to the topic of AudioParam.units - Chris, could you give details as to why that bit has been removed? Philip seemed to disagree with it (though not enough to reopen the bug with a counter proposal) and I'd like at least for the rationale to be documented. Thanks. 69606 4 crogers 2012-07-03 20:30:25 +0000 (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > We obviously agree with the removal, but lots of unrelated changes are included > > in the diff. Are those in need of review, and in the context of what bug? > > The other changes seem to be mostly examples and clarifications, so probably > uncontroversial. > > Back to the topic of AudioParam.units - Chris, could you give details as to why > that bit has been removed? Philip seemed to disagree with it (though not enough > to reopen the bug with a counter proposal) and I'd like at least for the > rationale to be documented. > > Thanks. Up to this point, the "units" attribute has really just been a stub with no real implementation, and we haven't yet defined different unit types yet (such as frequency, cents, etc.). So this is just a simplification which should not impact any content out in the field. So far, we've seen no urgent need, but if we later decide that this is important, then we can add it back in, defining the precise types. 69730 5 mage 2012-07-09 08:53:28 +0000 (In reply to comment #3) > Back to the topic of AudioParam.units - Chris, could you give details as to why > that bit has been removed? Philip seemed to disagree with it Just to clarify: we (me and Philip) think it's a good idea to remove AudioParam.units. 69731 6 olivier.thereaux 2012-07-09 09:16:36 +0000 (In reply to comment #5) > Just to clarify: we (me and Philip) think it's a good idea to remove > AudioParam.units. Thanks for the clarification Marcus. I see no reason to keep this issue open, then. [CLOSED]