<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>17250</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-05-30 17:32:09 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>fn-filter-012</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2012-05-31 09:55:11 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>XQuery 3 &amp; XPath 3 Test Suite</component>
          <version>Last Call drafts</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Kay">mike</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Tim Mills">tim</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>68312</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2012-05-30 17:32:09 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This test does

fn:filter( fn:string#1, () )

and expects the result ().

I think it is legitimate to raise XPTY0004, on the grounds that the supplied function is the wrong type: it returns a string rather than a boolean.

Under Errors and Optimization it is also legitimate to return ()</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>68368</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="O&apos;Neil Delpratt">oneil</who>
    <bug_when>2012-05-31 08:20:17 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Hi Tim, this seems right to me, however would you be able to resolve this bug issue. Thanks.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>68376</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Tim Mills">tim</who>
    <bug_when>2012-05-31 08:47:36 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Agreed.  For the record, it is the text

&quot;If the result of invoking the new function would necessarily result in a type error, that error may be raised during function coercion. It is implementation dependent whether this happens or not.&quot;

that permits XPTY0004.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>68383</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Tim Mills">tim</who>
    <bug_when>2012-05-31 09:19:05 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Fixed in CVS.  

Please mark the bug as CLOSED if you agree with the resolution.  Otherwise, REOPEN.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>