17239 2012-05-30 04:00:17 +0000 Better naming than "HTML namespace" (editorial) 2012-10-19 15:32:03 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified CSS Transforms unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 dschulze eoconnor ayg cmarrin dino dschulze eoconnor smfr public-css-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 68289 0 dschulze 2012-05-30 04:00:17 +0000 'The Transform Rendering Model' has a paragraph about layout with the term "HTML namespace" a comment on this paragraphs demands a better naming. 68763 1 smfr 2012-06-06 15:19:12 +0000 We need a phrase that covers "CSS applied to HTML/XHTML/XML". Or maybe the actual issue is SVG vs. non-SVG? 68772 2 dschulze 2012-06-07 01:40:12 +0000 I am not sure if there is an issue at all. Elements don't flow in SVG in general. Am I wrong? Therefore transforms of course don't affect the flow of elements for SVG. It would just be specifying something that is obvious. I am fine if we remove the constraint. 76634 3 smfr 2012-10-18 22:43:28 +0000 Use "elements whose layout is governed by the CSS box model". Maybe add a note to say that at present this is everything that is not SVG. 76641 4 eoconnor 2012-10-18 23:28:04 +0000 Fixed in ae9a92982b9e. 76702 5 dschulze 2012-10-19 15:25:04 +0000 We still have two places where we use "In the HTML namespace" in "The Transform Rendering Model". 76703 6 dschulze 2012-10-19 15:32:03 +0000 Removed all usages after changeset 604592536b17.