17170 2012-05-24 14:52:14 +0000 Named character references table: mismatch between code point and glyph 2012-07-18 18:47:47 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED DUPLICATE 12539 http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#entity-lang P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian mathias mike contributor oldest_to_newest 68078 0 contributor 2012-05-24 14:52:14 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/named-character-references.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#entity-lang Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#entity-lang Comment: Named character references table: mismatch between code point and glyph Posted from: 78.20.165.163 by mathias@qiwi.be User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_4) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/21.0.1148.0 Safari/537.1 68080 1 mathias 2012-05-24 15:13:23 +0000 There appears to be a typo here: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/named-character-references.html#entity-lang ⟨ is a named character reference for U+027E8, but the glyph in the “glyph” column appears to be some other code point. Getting the value with JavaScript results in U+2329. (Oddly, downloading the HTML using `curl` and opening it in Vi, I got U+3008.) The same goes for ⟨ (There appears to be a typo here: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/named-character-references.html#entity-langle). I’ve noticed similar issues with these table entries: ⟨ (U+2329 instead of U+27E8) 
 (U+240A instead of 0+000A) ⟩ (U+232A instead of U+27E9) ⟩ (U+232A instead of U+27E9) ⟩ (U+232A instead of U+27E9) 	 (U+2409 instead of U+0009) Some of these might be intentional, but other than that, could you please check and verify that the right example glyphs are being used? Thanks. 68302 2 mathias 2012-05-30 09:05:02 +0000 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 12539 ***