16969 2012-05-07 17:39:01 +0000 i18n-ISSUE-104: clarify "additional requirements on character encodings" 2014-02-28 21:30:31 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG HTML5 spec unspecified PC Windows NT CLOSED NEEDSINFO P2 normal --- 17860 1 addison dave.null annevk ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-i18n-core robin public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 67404 0 addison 2012-05-07 17:39:01 +0000 2.2.2 Dependencies http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/infrastructure.html#dependencies Contains this note: -- This specification might have certain additional requirements on character encodings, image formats, audio formats, and video formats in the respective sections. -- This note is not clear. I'm not sure what an "additional requirement on character encodings" would be? Does it mean that certain character encodings will be required/banned? 67565 1 ian 2012-05-10 17:50:22 +0000 For instance. Or that BOMs be used in particular ways, or that decoding happen in particular ways, or anything really. 70191 2 contributor 2012-07-18 07:05:17 +0000 This bug was cloned to create bug 17860 as part of operation convergence. 73331 3 robin 2012-09-06 16:36:09 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Additional Information Needed Rationale: (In reply to comment #0) > This note is not clear. I'm not sure what an "additional requirement on > character encodings" would be? Does it mean that certain character encodings > will be required/banned? Addison, based on Ian's explanation is this still unclear to you? If not, can you please detail what you find unclear and if possible provide some suggested text? 101655 4 addison 2014-02-28 21:30:31 +0000 I have reviewed the section in the current document. I don't think any additional changes are needed.