<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>16941</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-05-05 14:13:43 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[survey needed] Indexes: IBM extension to JIS X 0212</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2014-04-28 15:15:03 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WHATWG</product>
          <component>Encoding</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows 3.1</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution>
          <dup_id>25266</dup_id>
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>Unsorted</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>pub-w3</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Anne">annevk</assigned_to>
          <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>philipj</cc>
          
          <qa_contact>sideshowbarker+encodingspec</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>67345</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="">pub-w3</who>
    <bug_when>2012-05-05 14:13:43 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Most of the IBM selected kanji and one selected non-kanji are part of the official JIS X 0212 standard, and a few characters have been added to more recent versions of JIS X 0208.

The ones that are still missing can be found in an IBM extension to JIS X 0212, Rows 83--84.
Tables:
    &lt;http://coq.no/character-tables/ibmjapan2.pdf&gt;
    &lt;http://coq.no/character-tables/ibmjapan2.js&gt;

Safari&apos;s EUC-JP implementation includes this extension.  Adding it seems harmless, but I am not sure how useful it would be.  Perhaps someone could check whether this way of encoding IBM selected kanji and non-kanji is used in practice?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>81333</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Anne">annevk</who>
    <bug_when>2013-01-14 11:48:30 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>If it&apos;s in Safari that&apos;s probably because it&apos;s in ICU, which means Chrome has these too. Internet Explorer does not do 0212. Hmm.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>81352</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="">pub-w3</who>
    <bug_when>2013-01-14 19:55:22 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Chrome only includes Roman numerals and ㈱.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>81389</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Anne">annevk</who>
    <bug_when>2013-01-15 10:44:46 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I guess I rather stick to what Gecko and Opera have then. Less engines to changes.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>81417</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="">pub-w3</who>
    <bug_when>2013-01-15 18:20:11 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>That sounds reasonable.  I was hoping someone would check whether or not these characters are actually used on the Web, but I guess the lack of support for JIS X 0212 in IE makes extensions unlikely to be important.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>104563</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Anne">annevk</who>
    <bug_when>2014-04-28 15:15:03 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Since people seem opposed to even a subset of these, marking as duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 25266 ***</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>