16885 2012-04-29 16:15:36 +0000 Hidden issues in spec source 2012-10-18 22:36:40 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified CSS Transforms unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 dschulze smfr ayg cmarrin dino dschulze eoconnor smfr public-css-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 67165 0 dschulze 2012-04-29 16:15:36 +0000 There are some hidden issues in the spec text itself. I just listen the comments that I found in the markup: <!-- Does it actually this SVG spec? --> <!-- Probably need more here. --> <!-- Define "three-dimensional transform" ? --> <!-- This section is normative --> <!-- This "in the HTML namespace" is awkward. Is there a better way? --> <!-- Maybe define "tranform container" in the definitions, and use it everywhere in place of "containing block"? I'm not sure if "containing block" is exactly right. --> <!-- clarify --> <!-- Make this more mathy, with matrices? --> <!-- More detail required, probably with matrices --> <!-- (tighten this!) --> <!-- Others? --> <!-- This should not be in a normative section. --> We need to check if they are still valid and how we need to address them. For at least two of the comments we already have bug reports (6,8,9). Do we need to create bug reports for the others? 76631 1 smfr 2012-10-18 22:36:40 +0000 We've been through and either removed the comments, addressed them, or ensured that they are covered by bugs.