<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>16572</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-03-29 18:03:29 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Meta generator: Validator must say that alt conformance check was skipped</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2012-04-03 18:31:37 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML WG</product>
          <component>HTML5 spec</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>INVALID</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/the-img-element.html#guidance-for-conformance-checkers</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>a11y, a11y_text-alt</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Leif Halvard Silli">xn--mlform-iua</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</assigned_to>
          <cc>faulkner.steve</cc>
    
    <cc>laura.lee.carlson</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-a11y</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-admin</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-wg-issue-tracking</cc>
    
    <cc>xn--mlform-iua</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="HTML WG Bugzilla archive list">public-html-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>66245</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Leif Halvard Silli">xn--mlform-iua</who>
    <bug_when>2012-03-29 18:03:29 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Proposal: Add something like this to the spec:

   ]] Conformance checkers must allow users to separate pages for which @alt conformance check was performed, from pages (with the generator string) where it was not performed. [[

(The wording inspired from http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/obsolete#warnings-for-obsolete-but-conforming-features )

   Use case - in 3 steps:

1 Author runs the following four documents through the validator:
   doc A  with machine-checkable @alt errors + no meta generator string
   doc B w/error free machine-checkable @alt + no meta generator string
   doc C  with machine-checkable @alt errors + meta generator string
   doc D w/error free machine-checkable @alt + meta generator string
2 Validation results:
   doc A: non-conforming due to @alt conformance error;
   doc B: conforming;
   doc C: conforming;
   doc D: conforming;
3 Author&apos;s response to the validation results: 
   doc A: author fixes doc, validates anew and publishes;
   doc B, C and D: author is satisfied and publishes right away;

   Problems revealed in this use case: 

 FIRSTLY, for document C and D, the validator fails to inform the author
          that the docs were subject to a less thorough @alt conformance
          check than document A and B. This means that the author is
          is right to believe that B/C/D are equally conformant and 
          equally checked.
SECONDLY, HTML5 is actually clear that doc D, is non-conforming, quote:
       ]] (This case does not represent a case where the document is
          conforming, only that the generator could not determine
          appropriate alternative text [[

          Of course: That doc D is non-conforming, is not something that cannot be told, as long as the meta generator &quot;exception&quot; is in place. But it is the more important to give the user opportunity to understand that the reason for the lack of an error message, *might* simply be that the particualar issue was not checked for conformance.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>66247</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Leif Halvard Silli">xn--mlform-iua</who>
    <bug_when>2012-03-29 18:29:25 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Typo - this:

&quot;HTML5 is actually clear that doc D, is non-conforming&quot;

was meant to be

&quot;HTML5 is actually clear that doc _C_, is non-conforming.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>66383</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Leif Halvard Silli">xn--mlform-iua</who>
    <bug_when>2012-04-03 18:31:37 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Withdrawing.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>