16420 2012-03-18 08:40:32 +0000 nullable or non-nullable sequence type == sequence type ? 2012-03-19 08:51:05 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WebAppsWG WebIDL unspecified All All RESOLVED FIXED http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#idl-attributes P2 normal --- 1 glenn cam mike public-script-coord public-webapps-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 65709 0 glenn 2012-03-18 08:40:32 +0000 in 3.2.2 appears "The type of the attribute must not be a nullable or non-nullable sequence type, and it must not be a union type if one of its member types (or one of its member types’s member types, and so on) is a nullable or non-nullable sequence type." is it not redundant to say "nullable or non-nullable sequence type" when "sequence type" would suffice? or is not the case that "nullable or non-nullable" is tautologous? if it is not, then an example is sorely needed 65732 1 cam 2012-03-19 08:43:16 +0000 I use "sequence type" to mean the same thing as "non-nullable sequence type". I used the phrase "nullable or non-nullable sequence type" because I thought "(potentially nullable) sequence type" or similar would be confusing. I think I will go through and replace instances of "nullable or non-nullable X" with "X or nullable X". 65733 2 cam 2012-03-19 08:51:05 +0000 Done: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.485;r2=1.486;f=h