16353 2012-03-13 23:37:38 +0000 Use udpated WebIDL syntax 2012-05-04 17:08:46 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WebAppsWG HISTORICAL - DOM3 Events unspecified PC Windows NT VERIFIED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2011OctDec/0097.html LC, reviewerSatisfied P2 normal --- 1 travil travil mike Ms2ger plh www-dom public-webapps-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 65490 0 travil 2012-03-13 23:37:38 +0000 [PORTING to bug] Hi Doug, Jacob The DOM 3 Events specification includes WebIDL code in non-normative appendices, but the syntax used is obsolete. In particular, it uses '[Supplemental] interface', which was replaced with 'partial interface' and the 'in' and 'raises' keywords. Also, it seems that the specification does not use the 'Foo?' syntax for nullable types, and it has rather peculiar indentation. Please update the draft accordingly. Thanks Ms2ger 65491 1 travil 2012-03-13 23:39:36 +0000 The WebIDL syntax used in this spec was updated in the last revision of DOM3 Events. It should be congruent with the DOM4 syntax (except no event contstructors, of course). 65508 2 Ms2ger 2012-03-14 10:16:42 +0000 Thank you, the spec looks good now. 65639 3 travil 2012-03-15 22:37:11 +0000 Verified by opener. Thanks! 67330 4 plh 2012-05-04 16:54:15 +0000 One last mistake to fix in order to match WebIDL: [[ readonly attribute any? detail; ]] any doesn't seem to accept "?". 67333 5 travil 2012-05-04 17:08:36 +0000 (In reply to comment #4) > One last mistake to fix in order to match WebIDL: > > [[ > readonly attribute any? detail; > ]] > any doesn't seem to accept "?". Fixed. Thanks for the catch.