16181 2012-03-01 17:04:52 +0000 should schZ014_b be valid? 2012-12-04 00:54:00 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Test Suite Microsoft tests 2006-11-06 PC Windows 3.1 NEW needsAgreement P2 normal --- 1 am_spamfaenger cmsmcq David_E3 mike public-xml-schema-testsuite oldest_to_newest 64829 0 am_spamfaenger 2012-03-01 17:04:52 +0000 In my opinion test schZ014_b of set MS-Schema2006-07-15 should be valid for schema 1.1. Or is there any clause in the spec which prohibits empty values for the targetNamespace attribute? The anyURI datatype doesn't ("The ·lexical space· of anyURI is the set of finite-length sequences of zero or more characters (as defined in [XML]) that ·match· the Char production from [XML].") Section 3.17.2 XML Representations of Schemas says: "...supplying an empty string for targetNamespace is incoherent, and is not the same as not specifying it at all." So an empty value for targetNamespace is incoherent but not prohibited. Or is there some other clause in the spec which prohibits empty strings for the targetNamespace attribute? 66702 1 David_E3 2012-04-13 16:22:07 +0000 please see bug 16180. 66703 2 mike 2012-04-13 16:24:34 +0000 Noted that in part 1 there are only two remaining places where we talk of something being "incoherent", and in the other case we associate the phrase with a "must not" prohibition.