16156 2012-02-28 23:46:46 +0000 (editorial) link <position> to the definition in css3-background 2012-02-29 01:19:01 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified CSS Image Values and Replaced Content unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 kennyluck jackalmage fantasai.bugs public-css-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 64705 0 kennyluck 2012-02-28 23:46:46 +0000 Section: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#radial-gradients (4.2.1 in particular) I would expect to see the corresponding part in css3-background when I click <position>. No strong opinion though. Section: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#object-position Ditto. Linking to how <position> is used in radial-gradient() is certainly confusing. 64706 1 kennyluck 2012-02-29 00:03:26 +0000 Alternatively, you can say <position> is defined in css3-val and link there. I'll note that css3-background is not listed as a normative reference at the time. 64709 2 kennyluck 2012-02-29 00:07:22 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > Alternatively, you can say <position> is defined in css3-values and link there. Nevermind. The spec already does this. (In reply to comment #0) > Section: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#radial-gradients (4.2.1 in > particular) > > I would expect to see the corresponding part in css3-background when I click > <position>. No strong opinion though. s/css3-background/css3-values/ 64714 3 jackalmage 2012-02-29 00:34:30 +0000 Since I seem to already be doing what you're asking, I can just close this bug, right? I'm confused. ^_^ 64716 4 kennyluck 2012-02-29 00:44:10 +0000 (In reply to comment #3) > Since I seem to already be doing what you're asking, I can just close this bug, > right? I'm confused. ^_^ No. Both instances of <position> now link to how they are used as an argument to radial-gradient() but not how they are defined. This is particularly confusing for the second instance in the description of 'object-position'. I would expect to see the corresponding part in css3-values when I click on any <position>. 64717 5 jackalmage 2012-02-29 01:01:09 +0000 Ah, indeed. I didn't realize that <position> was just linking to radial-gradient's argument. There was a FIXME comment in the source with a link to V&U. ^_^ I've fixed it so that both the radial-gradient() and object-position use of <position> link to V&U. Note that this link is broken until we republish V&U, which we intended to do a long time ago and will get on top of immediately. For now, just pretend that the V&U WD has been updated to the latest ED. 64719 6 kennyluck 2012-02-29 01:19:01 +0000 (In reply to comment #5) > Note that this link is broken until we republish V&U, > which we intended to do a long time ago and will get on top of immediately. > For now, just pretend that the V&U WD has been updated to the latest ED. You can link to the ED in the css3-images ED though (if that's doable). I actually prefer that way.