16024 2012-02-18 19:32:59 +0000 should some/all of the prose on transitioning gradients be deferred? 2012-02-29 18:58:14 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified CSS Transitions unspecified All All NEW [needsresolution][easy] P2 normal --- 1 dbaron dino cmarrin eoconnor smfr public-css-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 64277 0 dbaron 2012-02-18 19:32:59 +0000 css3-transitions currently has a bit of prose on transitioning gradients. I'm not sure there's a whole lot of consensus around it; there have been various suggestions on how to improve it, and I'm not aware of implementations (see, e.g., Simon's bug 14612 comment 1 regarding WebKit). I think we should consider deferring rules for animation of gradients to css4-images. 64280 1 smfr 2012-02-18 21:03:24 +0000 Maybe css4-images should handle it. I agree that it should be deferred. 64735 2 smfr 2012-02-29 17:19:57 +0000 Is this a dup of bug 14612? 64751 3 dbaron 2012-02-29 18:58:14 +0000 No; that's proposing we fix the rules for interpolating gradients; this is proposing we remove what's already in the spec. (In other cases, the discussion on postponing an issue was about a feature request for something not in the spec; this is different because we need to remove something that currently is in the spec, so it's not simply postponing the issue because something needs to be removed.)