15887 2012-02-04 16:57:12 +0000 Editorial problems with Example 1 in 9.5.2 ('clear') 2012-12-04 00:52:35 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified CSS CSS Level 2 unspecified All Windows 3.1 NEW P2 normal --- 1 antonsforums bert public-css-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 63688 0 antonsforums 2012-02-04 16:57:12 +0000 Reported by Anton Prowse In 9.5.2 (Controlling flow next to floats: the 'clear' property), a new Example 1 was added – lifted word-for-word from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Feb/0108.html. This is a welcome addition, but in general its style is far too informal, and it also needs some cleaning up: # (B1 has no children and no padding or border) But we should state that it does have positive height. # [...]: block B2 with a top margin of M2 (no padding or border, no # children). B2 has 'clear' set to 'both'. We also assume B2 is not # empty. Assuming that B2 is non-replaced, it cannot be non-empty and yet have no children. Rather, we should state that it has positive height. # [...], we are in the situation described in the spec where we need # to add clearance This needs a proper cross-reference. We also need to refer to the hypothetical position at some point in this example. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0087.html (Issue 9)