15883 2012-02-04 15:55:57 +0000 Make undefined the used height of auto-height replaced elements with intrinsic ratio? (Issue 283) 2012-12-04 00:52:56 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified CSS CSS Level 2 unspecified All Windows 3.1 NEW P2 normal --- 1 antonsforums bert public-css-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 63682 0 antonsforums 2012-02-04 15:55:57 +0000 Reported by fantasai This is part of Issue 283 (see below) As per the resolution of Issue 283, 10.3.2 (width of inline, replaced elements) was changed as follows: # If 'height' and 'width' both have computed values of 'auto' # and the element has an intrinsic ratio but no intrinsic # height or width, <del>and</del> <ins>then the used value of # 'width' is undefined in CSS 2.1. However, it is suggested # that, if</ins> the containing block's width does not # itself depend on the replaced element's width, then the used # value of 'width' is calculated from the constraint equation # used for block-level, non-replaced elements in normal flow. A similar change was proposed for 10.6.1 (height of non-abspos replaced elements): | Otherwise, if 'height' has a computed value of 'auto', and | the element has an intrinsic ratio then the used value of | 'height' <del>is: (used width) / (intrinsic ratio)</del> | <ins>is undefined. However it is suggested that it be | calculated from the used width and intrinsic ratio so that | the aspect ratio is preserved.</ins> This latter change was rejected, yet Issue 283 remained open on the Issues wiki with the comment "Edited. =Bert= Missing edits to 10.6.2 (if first proposal is preferred)". It needs to be decided whether to make the latter change or not. Conversation begins: Bug description: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0519.html Rejection: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0623.html Issue 283: http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-283 Summary No passes for replaced-intrinsic-ratio-001 Resolution Undefine sizing of replaced elements with intrinsic ratio but no size. Proposal http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0519.html Proposal http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0623.html Status Edited. =Bert= Missing edits to 10.6.2 (if first proposal is preferred)