<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>1585</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-07-14 04:19:19 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[FS] technical: 4.1.5 Function Calls: free pattern in not()</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-09-06 13:00:06 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>Formal Semantics 1.0</component>
          <version>Last Call drafts</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Dyck">jmdyck</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Jerome Simeon">simeon</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4559</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Dyck">jmdyck</who>
    <bug_when>2005-07-14 04:19:19 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>4.1.5 Function Calls

DErr / rule (2|3|4)
&quot;statEnv |- not (Value against Type promotes to Value&apos;)&quot;
(rule 2 also has &apos;i&apos; subscripts, no matter)
    This doesn&apos;t do what you want. The pattern Value&apos; has no other
    occurrence in the rule, so given *any* bindings for Value and Type,
    it&apos;s easy to find a binding for Value&apos; that makes the premise hold.
    (Never have a completely free pattern within a not()!)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>5067</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Dyck">jmdyck</who>
    <bug_when>2005-07-21 04:04:38 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>STA / rule 3
&quot;not(Type1 = (AtomicType1,1|...|AtomicType1,m1))&quot;
&quot;not(Typen = (AtomicTypen,1|...|AtomicTypen,mn))&quot;
    Same thing.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>5243</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Jerome Simeon">simeon</who>
    <bug_when>2005-07-27 04:20:50 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>As the WGs have decided to remove the sections corresponding to dynamic errors,
this comment should now be moot.
- Jerome</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>5609</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Jerome Simeon">simeon</who>
    <bug_when>2005-08-31 15:27:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The XML Query and XLST WGs have decided to close this comment as moot, with no
further action.
- Jerome</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>