15759 2012-01-28 07:16:46 +0000 Chrome implementation (at least) now has addTrack() not addTextTrack() 2012-07-18 18:39:32 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED WORKSFORME http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#text-track-api P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian ian kennyluck mike samdutton silviapfeiffer1 contributor oldest_to_newest 63214 0 contributor 2012-01-28 07:16:46 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-video-element.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#text-track-api Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#text-track-api Comment: I noticed that in Chrome's implementation, at least, addTextTrack() is now addTrack() Posted from: 92.21.40.133 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1020.0 Safari/535.19 63315 1 zcorpan 2012-01-30 09:26:17 +0000 File a bug with Chrome. 63322 2 kennyluck 2012-01-30 10:48:53 +0000 Reopening. It's pretty clear that the reporter asks for the spec matching Chrome. This bug deserves at least a WONTFIX. 63348 3 ian 2012-01-30 19:48:23 +0000 What do other browsers do? Is there a bug filed on Chrome/WebKit? 63373 4 silviapfeiffer1 2012-01-31 00:19:23 +0000 (In reply to comment #3) > What do other browsers do? Is there a bug filed on Chrome/WebKit? I believe it may be because WebKit implemented an early version of the spec where it was still called addTrack(). Bug registered: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77381 63391 5 zcorpan 2012-01-31 08:27:26 +0000 Opera has implemented addTextTrack() (although there's no public build yet). 63464 6 silviapfeiffer1 2012-01-31 22:51:37 +0000 WebKit change has been committed: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77381 It's now also called addTextTrack() I think this can be closed