15536 2012-01-12 19:43:18 +0000 [Explainer]: Clarify more how isolation will work 2013-05-29 02:03:08 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WebAppsWG HISTORICAL - Component Model unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 14949 1 dglazkov dglazkov dominicc public-webapps-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 62610 0 dglazkov 2012-01-12 19:43:18 +0000 "var service = new Worker("http://example.com/adorable/service/worker.js");" Olli points out that this will either throw an exception or will need to run in the context of http://example.com, which is not what we expect. 88270 1 dominicc 2013-05-28 08:11:11 +0000 It looks like the way to do this is with an IFRAME. But if you want encapsulation, you need two nested IFRAMEs. Time to buy more RAM. 88282 2 dglazkov 2013-05-28 16:11:57 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > It looks like the way to do this is with an IFRAME. But if you want > encapsulation, you need two nested IFRAMEs. Time to buy more RAM. Perhaps we should just nix this section from explainer? We'll work through this via WebAppSec+WebApps group collaboration and then add to explainer when there's something to report. 88345 3 dominicc 2013-05-29 02:03:08 +0000 Nixed in https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/rev/00f6b281ba9b