15158 2011-12-12 23:32:12 +0000 Change use of "relevant namespace object" term re workers 2012-10-19 22:29:35 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#dedicated-workers-and-the-dedicatedworkerglobalscope-interface P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian cam ian mike contributor oldest_to_newest 61467 0 contributor 2011-12-12 23:32:12 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/workers.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#dedicated-workers-and-the-dedicatedworkerglobalscope-interface Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#dedicated-workers-and-the-dedicatedworkerglobalscope-interface Comment: Now that the "relevant namespace object" term has gone from Web IDL (since modules have been removed) some text around here needs to be rewritten. You probably want to refer to you don't need to mention the ECMAScript global object specifically, but instead you might want to refer to Web IDL's #dfn-expose, which can be used to control which interfaces are exposed in a particular ECMAScript global environment. Just say "ECMAScript global environments for dedicated workers must not _expose_ the SharedWorkerGlobalScope interface." and vice versa. I think that should be sufficient. Posted from: 150.101.156.250 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0a1) Gecko/20111209 Firefox/11.0a1 70468 1 contributor 2012-07-18 07:59:53 +0000 This bug was cloned to create bug 18003 as part of operation convergence. 71953 2 ian 2012-08-09 00:16:11 +0000 I've tried to fix this, but I've no idea if what I wrote is right. Please do review it. 71954 3 contributor 2012-08-09 00:22:05 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r7226. Check-in comment: Upgrade Web IDL terminology. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7225&to=7226 71955 4 cam 2012-08-09 00:37:38 +0000 The change looks good to me. (The transitive requirement is probably a bit of a pain if you want to know, from looking at the spec, whether a given interface should be exposed or not.) 75926 5 ian 2012-10-11 02:32:15 +0000 *** Bug 17166 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 76775 6 ian 2012-10-19 22:29:35 +0000 *** Bug 18188 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***