<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>15083</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-12-06 21:51:22 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Concerns over Error accumulation vs. performance</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2012-12-03 07:42:47 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>CSS</product>
          <component>Exclusions</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Vincent Hardy">vhardy</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Vincent Hardy">vhardy</assigned_to>
          <cc>eoconnor</cc>
    
    <cc>ratan</cc>
          
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61046</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Vincent Hardy">vhardy</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-06 21:51:22 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Version: Nov. 2011 Editor Draft.

From: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Nov/0714.html

Error accumulation vs. performance in cases where there is a
       cyclic dependency between the position/size of the exclusion
       and the surrounding content it affects. (For example, when
       the exclusion is centered or otherwise referencing the bottom
       edge, actually getting the position right would require
       multiple-pass layout. The current spec limits it to two passes,
       which will give wrong results in many cases.)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61053</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Vincent Hardy">vhardy</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-06 22:05:15 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>From Rossen:

There is really nothing to talk about here. IOW, if anyone comes up with a better proposal that fixes the problem we</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>79260</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Rossen Atanassov">ratan</who>
    <bug_when>2012-12-03 07:42:47 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The issue was discussed and resolved as closed during 11/2012 TPAC in Lyon, France.

http://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/?date=2012-10-28</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>