15005 2011-11-30 13:41:30 +0000 <rt> semantics: define the term "ruby base" and define that the <rt> element annotates the previous ruby base (even if another <rt> also annotates the same base) 2012-08-20 22:00:10 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-rt-element P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian ian kennyluck mike contributor oldest_to_newest 60665 0 contributor 2011-11-30 13:41:30 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/text-level-semantics.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#the-rt-element Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#the-rt-element Comment: Clarify what "immediately precedes" means here, in particularly I don't think that would include previous <rt> element. Posted from: 114.43.115.15 by kennyluck@csail.mit.edu User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_1) AppleWebKit/534.48.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Safari/534.48.3 61170 1 ian 2011-12-07 23:34:44 +0000 It doesn't include a previous <rt> element because an <rt> element isn't phrasing content. But I guess I'll try to find another way to describe it. Maybe by introducing a term that is defined imperatively (with an algorithm), and then saying that's what it annotates. While I'm at it I should make multiple adjacent <rt>s be multiple annotations for the same content, and make it explicitly skip inter-element whitespace text nodes. 70458 2 contributor 2012-07-18 07:59:03 +0000 This bug was cloned to create bug 17998 as part of operation convergence. 71535 3 ian 2012-07-26 23:28:44 +0000 Specifically, I think I need to define the term "ruby base" algorithmically as being the descendant content of a <ruby>, separated by <rt> elements, except that ruby bases consisting of only intra-element whitespace don't count, and then define that the <rt> element annotates the previous ruby base (even if another <rt> also annotates the same base).