<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>1490</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-06-01 17:54:58 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>ERR XTDE0800 - Redundant error</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-07-14 18:50:52 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>XSLT 2.0</component>
          <version>Last Call drafts</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Joanne Tong">joannet</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Michael Kay">mike</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2992</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Joanne Tong">joannet</who>
    <bug_when>2005-06-01 17:54:59 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Error XTDE0800 seems to be redundant, given the existence of error XTDE0070.  
The former just describes a specific situation in which the context item 
becomes undefined.  I suggest that XTDE0800 be deleted.

ERR XTDE0070 
&quot;When the focus is undefined, evaluation of any expression that references the 
context item, context position, or context size results in a non-recoverable 
dynamic error.&quot;

ERR XTDE0800 
&quot;Within the body of a stylesheet function, the focus is initially undefined; 
this means that any attempt to reference the context item, context position, or 
context size is a non-recoverable dynamic error.&quot;

Thanks,
Joanne</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4340</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Norman Walsh">Norman.Walsh</who>
    <bug_when>2005-06-23 17:24:59 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>At the 23 June telcon, the XSL WG decided to delete XTDE0800.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4342</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2005-06-24 13:20:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I have updated the spec, deleting error XTDE0800 and replacing it with a
reference to XTDE0070. However, since the context item is generally referenced
from within an XPath expression, I wonder whether we shouldn&apos;t go further, and
use the XPath error XPDY0002?

Michael Kay</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4655</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2005-07-14 18:50:38 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Decided not to pursue the suggestion of using the XPath error code. The bug is
now fixed and will shortly (or momentarily, as the Americans say...) be closed.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>