<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>14885</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-11-20 16:45:27 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>&quot;4.9.1.1. Exception interface object [[Call]] method&quot; does not match browsers</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2011-12-27 19:36:46 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebAppsWG</product>
          <component>WebIDL</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Aryeh Gregor">ayg</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Cameron McCormack">cam</assigned_to>
          <cc>allen</cc>
    
    <cc>brendan</cc>
    
    <cc>cam</cc>
    
    <cc>dominicc</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>public-script-coord</cc>
    
    <cc>travil</cc>
          
          <qa_contact>public-webapps-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>60215</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Aryeh Gregor">ayg</who>
    <bug_when>2011-11-20 16:45:27 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Browsers all throw when you do DOMException() (tested: IE9, Firefox 11a1, Chrome 17 dev, Opera 12.00).  The exception interface object is not a function.  Is this section deliberately different from how browsers behave, or is it an error?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>60291</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Travis Leithead [MSFT]">travil</who>
    <bug_when>2011-11-21 17:51:50 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This was a fairly recent change to WebIDL--you can&apos;t expect all browsers to immediately switch their implementations ;-)

I thought this was a deliberate decision to better align with ECMAScript for the long term.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>60296</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Brendan Eich">brendan</who>
    <bug_when>2011-11-21 19:38:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; This was a fairly recent change to WebIDL--you can&apos;t expect all browsers to
&gt; immediately switch their implementations ;-)
&gt; 
&gt; I thought this was a deliberate decision to better align with ECMAScript for
&gt; the long term.

Yes, that&apos;s what I recall too.

/be</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>60301</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Aryeh Gregor">ayg</who>
    <bug_when>2011-11-21 19:49:01 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;m fine with that.  Then this bug should be marked WONTFIX, and I&apos;ll write test cases per spec that all browsers fail.  I&apos;m just file any discrepancies I find as possible spec bugs, since if all browsers agree on behavior then usually that&apos;s what we want to spec.  I suggest that notes be added to the spec when it&apos;s known that the behavior disagrees with all browsers, so that it&apos;s clear that those parts of the spec are deliberate proposed changes from the status quo.  They can be removed once we have a major browser shipping with the change.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61287</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Cameron McCormack">cam</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-09 06:09:31 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Yes, this should be WONTFIX.  Adding a note to the spec about being deliberately different from all existing implementations here would make me want to do it for all features, and that&apos;s probably a bit of a time sink.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>62055</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Aryeh Gregor">ayg</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-27 19:36:46 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Okay with me.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>