14707 2011-11-06 09:26:17 +0000 "For the purposes of document summaries, outlines, and the like," should be treated as a UI issue, and should not be restricted in what text to use. It is e.g. resonable to join the headings with ": " if the hgroup is used for heading+subheading. 2012-08-09 18:01:04 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-hgroup-element P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian ian mike zcorpan contributor oldest_to_newest 59667 0 contributor 2011-11-06 09:26:17 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/sections.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#the-hgroup-element Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#the-hgroup-element Comment: "For the purposes of document summaries, outlines, and the like," should be treated as a UI issue, and should not be restricted in what text to use. It is e.g. resonable to join the headings with ": " if the hgroup is used for heading+subheading. Posted from: 85.227.157.105 by simonp@opera.com User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/16.0.912.21 Safari/535.7 59878 1 ian 2011-11-11 00:20:51 +0000 That seems reasonable. Do you think we should remove the paragraph entirely, or do you think there is value in some weaker wording as implementation advice? If the latter, what do you think it should say? 59898 2 zcorpan 2011-11-11 07:18:30 +0000 Either is fine with me. 61159 3 ian 2011-12-07 23:19:42 +0000 I'll nuke the paragraph and make sure there's an example somewhere that gives sample behaviour. 69952 4 contributor 2012-07-13 18:41:44 +0000 This bug was cloned to create bug 17774 as part of operation convergence. 71981 5 contributor 2012-08-09 18:01:04 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r7234. Check-in comment: Let tools decide how to render <hgroup>s in ToCs and so on. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7233&to=7234