<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>14705</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-11-05 21:49:20 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>appcache: SOP requirement for cache manifest files should be relaxed (at least) by CORS.</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2013-04-24 16:40:55 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML WG</product>
          <component>HTML5 spec</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Tobie Langel">tobie.langel</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="This bug has no owner yet - up for the taking">dave.null</assigned_to>
          <cc>adrianba</cc>
    
    <cc>annevk</cc>
    
    <cc>blizzard</cc>
    
    <cc>ian</cc>
    
    <cc>jonas</cc>
    
    <cc>michaeln</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>Nasserbufahad</cc>
    
    <cc>plh</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-admin</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-wg-issue-tracking</cc>
    
    <cc>robin</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="HTML WG Bugzilla archive list">public-html-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>59661</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Tobie Langel">tobie.langel</who>
    <bug_when>2011-11-05 21:49:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This enables putting the manifest files on a CDN.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>59879</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</who>
    <bug_when>2011-11-11 00:22:15 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>EDITOR&apos;S RESPONSE: This is an Editor&apos;s Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: It would also enable a hostile open wifi access point to permanently hijack facebook.com to point to evil.example.net, which seems, to put it mildly, problematic.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>59963</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="">michaeln</who>
    <bug_when>2011-11-11 20:44:58 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Reopening in the hopes of gathering more input about why the SOP for this is a problem and what might be done to resolve it.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>60900</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-03 22:23:56 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Reassigning to michaeln as per comment 2. If you gather actionable input, please don&apos;t hesitate to reassign this to me so I can study it further.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>63080</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Tobie Langel">tobie.langel</who>
    <bug_when>2012-01-24 22:14:21 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This was an attempt at solving use-case #2 here: http://www.w3.org/community/fixing-appcache/2012/01/18/appcache_use_cases/#use_case_2

Allow an application hosted on a cluster of servers to be easily updated
An application is hosted on a cluster of servers behind a non-sticky load balancer. It is updated daily. Even though all servers are not updated instantly and two versions of the application co-exist for a while, it is possible to update the application without risking to have an out-of sync version of the application (e.g. manifest file and assets of the latest version combined with a Master Entry of the previous version) or to need to invalidate the cache to avoid such issues.

Probably would have been more useful to provide the use case upfront rather that potential solutions.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>70073</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="">contributor</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-18 04:37:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This bug was cloned to create bug 17802 as part of operation convergence.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>81777</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Robin Berjon">robin</who>
    <bug_when>2013-01-21 16:00:43 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Mass move to &quot;HTML WG&quot;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>81883</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Robin Berjon">robin</who>
    <bug_when>2013-01-21 16:03:21 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Mass move to &quot;HTML WG&quot;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>82689</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Anne">annevk</who>
    <bug_when>2013-02-07 11:16:50 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Ian, why could a wireless not do that anyway over HTTP without TLS? And if there is TLS, there is no problem to begin with.

You still need CORS because of the update events (I think). You also need a new crossorigin attribute on &lt;html&gt; to control the details.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>86692</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Robin Berjon">robin</who>
    <bug_when>2013-04-24 16:40:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>EDITOR&apos;S RESPONSE: This is an Editor&apos;s Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:

   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: none
Rationale: Supporters of this use case no longer seem to believe it important.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>