14566 2011-10-26 07:38:57 +0000 foreignObject as child of <svg> 2011-10-27 01:18:42 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified SVG Definitions All Specifications All All RESOLVED INVALID P2 normal Test Suite 1 jay schepers cam jeremie.patonnier mike www-svg oldest_to_newest 58979 0 jay 2011-10-26 07:38:57 +0000 SVG1.1 Second Edition states 'Usually, a 58983 1 jeremie.patonnier 2011-10-26 08:59:07 +0000 The spec is very clear, <foreignObject> can be used inside other elements than <switch> Each element definition said specifically if it can contain <foreignObject> or not. for example, see : http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/struct.html#SVGElement So it seams that the RelaxNG file is flowed :-/ All the following elements can contain <foreignObject> (according to SVG 1.1 2nd Edition) svg g defs desc title symbol switch style marker mask a script glyph missing-glyph metadata 58993 2 longsonr 2011-10-26 12:45:15 +0000 This changed in SVG 1.1 Second Edition... http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-SVG11-20100622/changes.html#WholeDocument 58995 3 cam 2011-10-26 16:06:23 +0000 There is also no official RelaxNG supplied by the Working Group for SVG 1.1 Second Edition. Sounds like this is just a bug that needs fixing in the validator. 59039 4 mike 2011-10-27 01:15:11 +0000 (In reply to comment #3) > There is also no official RelaxNG supplied by the Working Group for SVG 1.1 > Second Edition. The validator.nu backend uses the schema from http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/rng/ > Sounds like this is just a bug that needs fixing in the validator. The "bug" is that the validator.nu backend is using a schema that apparently has not yet been updated to incorporate the changes made for the second edition of SVG 1.1. That's kind of expected since validator.nu has had SVG 1.1 support for several years now, and SVG 1.1 second edition only became a Rec two months ago... If the SVG WG is not officially maintaining the http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/rng/ schema, then I'd suggest the group consider doing that, and updating it with the changes for the second edition. It would seem very odd to me for the group to provide an updated DTD but not an updated RelaxNG schema. 59040 5 mike 2011-10-27 01:18:42 +0000 (In reply to comment #2 from Robert Longson) > This changed in SVG 1.1 Second Edition... > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-SVG11-20100622/changes.html#WholeDocument Thanks -- I was confused about where the discrepancy came from. Now it's clear.